Thank you, Ted Gibson. Major improvement from the rooster.
(Although, do the extensions need to be THAT long? I’m not sure.)
photo credit: People
Thank you, Ted Gibson. Major improvement from the rooster.
(Although, do the extensions need to be THAT long? I’m not sure.)
photo credit: People
Heather B.
January 7, 2010 at 8:08 amThey also look so totally fake and yet a vast improvement for whatever the hell it was she had going on before.
.-= Heather B.´s last blog ..Let’s call this a comeback =-.
Jackie W.
January 7, 2010 at 8:13 amPlease tell me she is NOT going to be given a talk show.
amie
January 7, 2010 at 8:18 amGood idea but I think the execution could be better. In that photo they kind of look like the clip on kind you get at the drugstore. But good for her. She is moving on and leaving that awful hot mess of a hairstyle behind. Now what are all those ladies who mutilated their hair to be like her style going to do?
Rhi
January 7, 2010 at 8:30 amI almost think she looks more ridiculous with the extensions.
ClassyFabSarah
January 7, 2010 at 8:32 amNot gonna lie – I hate the extensions. Seeing as though she is her brand and her image… these hair extensions basically wiped that out.
I think it’s a huge mistake… and what was wrong with the wavy hair she had on the View? She was adorable then and looked like herself.
Now she looks like a Britney Spears backup dancer or something similarly… trashy.
.-= ClassyFabSarah´s last blog ..Snowpocalypse 2010 =-.
Sarah
January 7, 2010 at 9:03 amI think no matter what, Kate will always look a little ridiculous. It’s just in her DNA. However, I’m THRILLED to finally be spared from the rooster.
Jenibee
January 7, 2010 at 11:57 amReally, wasn’t her 15 minutes up LONG ago? To keep my comment hair-centric – yeah, the extensions are *slightly* better than the rooster. But she still just needs to slide on into obscurity now. Buh-bye.
Amy in StL
January 7, 2010 at 1:24 pmI agree that I hated her weird reverse mullet. But those extensions do look like the clip on kind you buy at the mall. How weird. She couldn’t afford better? Or is it that she couldn’t get better because she has NO HAIR BEHIND HER EARS.
KH
January 7, 2010 at 6:12 pmIt better….. But it’s still not “good.”
KH
January 7, 2010 at 6:13 pmIt’s better….. But it’s still not “good.”
KH
January 7, 2010 at 6:13 pmDarn, I thought I caught it before my grammatical blunder was published… *Sigh*
Lauren
January 8, 2010 at 8:16 amI actually think she would have looked better with Elin’s (Tiger’s wife’s) hair to the right of Kate’s photo! :)
Rachel Shingleton
January 8, 2010 at 8:46 amUGH. Yeah, at least she’s gotten rid of that awful ‘do, but these extensions need some serious help, too. Better blending or SOMETHING around her face.
.-= Rachel Shingleton´s last blog ..Re: Built-In Shelves =-.
Athenista
January 8, 2010 at 10:03 amI can’t figure out which line my thoughts are in…
On one hand, I am jumping for joy that I’m not looking at that rooster-esque … *thing* she had going on before.
On the other… the actual extensions look ridiculous. If they’d left them at about chin length, I might’ve bought it.
Regardless… it’s a step up.
.-= Athenista´s last blog ..shopping my closet =-.
Mia
January 9, 2010 at 6:25 pmI just read on dlisted.com that those extensions cost $6,450. I could think of about a million better ways to spend that much money…